The LNCaP Xenograft Model for Prostate Cancer

Mimicking the Natural Progression of Prostate Cancer

LNCaP cells were originally isolated in 1977 from metastasis in the left supraclavicular lymph node of a 50-year-old Caucasian male. Being metastatic, slow-growing, androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cells, ideal for modeling the typical progression of prostate cancer for therapeutic development.

Although 2D cell culture models are good at providing foundational insights, the LNCaP xenograft mouse model offers an in vivo environment that better reflects clinical conditions. This ensures comprehensive preclinical testing in a model that mimics the majority of prostate cancers.

Advantages of the LNCaP Xenograft Model

  • Achieve relevant insights with androgen-sensitive human prostate cancer cells
  • Reduce lead timelines with 4-6 week tumor establishment in mice to shorten study time
  • Adapt to research challenges with flexible delivery, including subcutaneous and orthotopic xenografts
  • Rely on a dependable cell line elevated to an innovative 3D culture system

Personalize your prostate cancer research with our custom services

Elevate your prostate cancer research with our LNCaP xenograft model, ideal for studying androgen receptor signaling and therapeutic efficacy in vivo.

Contact us for more information on our bespoke services, including IVIS imaging, PK studies, and tumor biomarker analyses.

  • We chose Melior Discovery because they were responsive and cost effective.  We are staying with them as a chosen scientific partner because of their thoughtful scientific input to experimental design and attention to detail.  Their expertise and flexibility allowed us to quickly adapt the study design and evaluate additional outcome measures to pursue unexpected activity.

    Sridharan Rajamani, Ph.D., Senior Research Scientist

    Gilead Sciences
  • I have been working with Melior on a number of projects over the course of a few years now.  They have been a great partner throughout this time.  The scientists whom I have worked with have been great problem-solvers and were customer focused.

    Jay Lichter

    Avalon Ventures
  • Melior provided State-of-the-art Preclinical Pharmacology Support for a period of nearly a year where a series of in vivo studies were completed on a weekly basis. The staff was extremely user-friendly and the operational processes were excellent. I can recommend Melior without reservation.

    Richard DiMarchi, PhD

    Cox Professor of Chemistry & Gill Chair in Biomolecular Sciences Indiana University, Department of Chemistry
  • Because Melior could do the orthotopic intracranial implants, we were able to do survival studies with brain tumor-bearing animals that were treated with our therapy, showing a beautiful survival with our agent versus control. Talk about something that gets your investors going! These beautiful survival curves with our agent versus control and visual photos are in all of our investor decks because… it's powerful.

    Bruce Ruggeri, Ph.D.

    Modifi Bio
  • Melior works in many therapeutic areas, like CNS, inflammatory disease, GI, cardiovascular, and oncology. I was very pleased that when it came to doing tumor studies, both subcutaneous and intracranial, they did them well. They reported on the studies on time and did the data analysis really well.

    Bruce Ruggeri, Ph.D.

    Modifi Bio
  • Their areas of expertise are extensive, and they are very experienced, responsive, and flexible in terms of how the study is run. Their pricing is reasonable, making them the best option for a young, not well-funded company like ours.

    Maxine Gowen

    Tamuro Bio
  • Melior’s team was very experienced and knowledgeable. They were always very open to suggestions and questions, spending a lot of time helping us feel comfortable with the study design. I would give them very high marks.

    Maxine Gowen

    Tamuro Bio
  • The most important factors in choosing to work with Melior were the fit between the tests they could run and our needs, as well as their tight budget and proximity. Melior was the best fit for our research goals.

    Ira Spector

    SFA Therapeutics

Human prostate cancer LNCaP xenograft model. 1×106 LNCaP cells were subcutaneously injected into the rear flank of nude mice. The growth of the tumor was monitored twice per week. Data area mean +/- SEM.

Did you know we offer comprehensive sample collection with our LNCaP xenograft model?

We provide collection services for blood and tissue samples for PK, flow cytometry, ELISA, H&E, HIF/HIC, and more. These samples provide critical data on tumor progression, treatment response, and biomarker analysis, enhancing the depth of your research.

Publications

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the advantages of LNCaP cells over PC3, and DU145 in a xenograft model?

The LNCaP cell line is androgen-sensitive, making it ideal for modeling early-stage prostate cancer and androgen receptor signaling. PC3 and DU145 are both androgen-independent, representing more aggressive, late-stage prostate cancer. LNCaP cells are best for studying the transition from androgen dependence to independence, while the cell lines PC3 and DU145 are valuable for research on advanced, hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

What types of studies can be performed using the LNCaP xenograft model?

The LNCaP xenograft model is ideal for use in various study types, including:

  • Drug efficacy testing
  • Androgen receptor signaling
  • Tumor biomarker analyses
  • Pharmacokinetics (PK) studies

The model also supports personalized services like IVIS imaging for monitoring tumor growth and metastasis.

How quickly can the LNCaP xenograft model be prepared?

The LNCaP xenograft model can be ready for treatment in 4-6 weeks following cell inoculation, and the treatment window can be 8-10 weeks.

Citations

  1. Heinlein, C. A., Chang, C. Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer. EndocrineReviews, 25(2), 276–308. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2002-0032
  2. Horoszewicz, J. S., Leong, S. S., Kawinski, E., Karr, J. P., Rosenthal, H., Chu, T. M., Mirand, E. A., & Murphy, G. P. (1983). LNCaP model of human prostatic carcinoma. Cancer research, 43(4), 1809–1818.
  3. James, N. D., Tannock, I., N’Dow, J., Feng, F., Gillessen, S., Ali, S. A., Trujillo, B., Al-Lazikani, B., Attard, G., Bray, F., Compérat, E., Eeles, R., Fatiregun, O., Grist, E., Halabi, S., Haran, Á., Herchenhorn, D., Hofman, M. S., Jalloh, M., Loeb, S., … Xie, L. P. (2024). The Lancet Commission on prostate cancer: planning for the surge in cases. Lancet (London, England), 403(10437), 1683–1722. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00651-2
  4. Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., & Bray, F. (2021). Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 71(3), 209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660